0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÚÃë¿©´ë»ýÀÇ °Ç°­ÁõÁø »ýÈ°¾ç½Ä°ú °ü·Ã¿äÀÎ

Health Promotion Behaviors and related factors in College Women who live alone

ÀÌÈ­°£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 43±Ç 1È£ p.17 ~ 27
KMID : 0373820090430010017
±è´Ù¿¬ ( Kim D.-Y. ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

±è¹Ì³ª ( Kim M.-N. ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
±èÀçȯ ( Kim J.-H. ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
±èÇâÁö ( Kim H.J. ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹Ú¼±¾Æ ( Park S.-A ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¹Ú¼º¿ø ( Park S.W. ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
Á¤µµ¿µ ( Jung D.Y. ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
Á¤Çϳª ( Jung H.N. ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
ÃÖ¼ÒÈñ ( Choi S.H. ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
ÀÌÀÚÇü ( Lee Ja-Hyung ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
Á¤´öÀ¯ ( Jung Duk-Yoo ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ
¿À¼øÈ­ ( Oh S.H. ) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to know relationship between important variables which influence lifestyle in college women`s health promotion, prove adjustable factors and provide basic data which develops nursing intervention health promotion program. The method of this study was descriptive correlational study. The convenience sample was 206 college woman who live alone in lodgings, dormitory, a reading room or off-campus housing. Research instruments were the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control(MHLC) developed by Wallston, Wallston £¦ Devellis(1978), Interpersonal Support Evaluation List developed by Cohern, Hoberman(1983) and The Health Promotion Lifestyle Profile(HPLP) developed by Walker, Pender £¦ Sechrist(1978) and the data was used after Factor Analysis. The result of this study was follows. 1. It can be found that the level of the college woman`s health promotion lifestyle was 2.46¡¾.33 with higher fulfilling level: According to general characteristic, the level of health promotion lifestyle was 5% significant statistical differences by age and period of menstruation. 2. The level of health locus of control was 3.25¡¾.31 with higher fulfilling level. 3. The interpersonal support level was 3.05¡¾.44 with higher fulfilling level. 4. The level of interpersonal support turned out most convincing factor in health promotion lifestyle (9%). In addition to age factor, two factors was 10% power of explanation in whole health promotion.
KeyWords
¿©´ë»ý, °Ç°­ÁõÁø »ýÈ°¾ç½Ä
College women, Health promotion lifestyle
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸